ROUND TABLE CONFERENCES
(1930-1932)
The Indian political community received the Simon Commission
Report issued in June 1930 with great resentment. Different political parties
gave vent to their feelings in different ways.
The Congress started a Civil Disobedience Movement under
Gandhi’s command. The Muslims reserved their opinion on the Simon Report
declaring that the report was not final and the matters should be decided after
consultations with the leaders representing all communities in India.
The Indian political situation seemed deadlocked. The British
government refused to contemplate any form of self-government for the people of
India. This caused frustration amongst the masses, who often expressed their
anger in violent clashes.
The Labor Government returned to power in Britain in 1931, and a
glimmer of hope ran through Indian hearts. Labor leaders had always been
sympathetic to the Indian cause. The government decided to hold a Round Table
Conference in London to consider new constitutional reforms. All Indian
politicians; Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians were summoned to London for
the conference.
Gandhi immediately insisted at the conference that he alone
spoke for all Indians, and that the Congress was the party of the people of
India. He argued that the other parties only represented sectarian viewpoints,
with little or no significant following.
First Round Table Conference
The first session of the conference opened in London on November
12, 1930. All parties were present except for the Congress, whose leaders were
in jail due to the Civil Disobedience Movement. Congress leaders stated that
they would have nothing to do with further constitutional discussion unless the
Nehru Report was enforced in its entirety as the constitution of India.
Almost 89 members attended the conference, out of which 58 were
chosen from various communities and interests in British India, and the rest
from princely states and other political parties. The prominent among the
Muslim delegates invited by the British government were Sir Aga Khan,
Quaid-i-Azam, Maulana Muhammad Ali Jouhar, Sir Muhammad Shafi and Maulvi
Fazl-i-Haq. Sir Taj Bahadur Sapru, Mr. Jaikar and Dr. Moonje were outstanding
amongst the Hindu leaders.
The Muslim-Hindu differences over casted the conference as the
Hindus were pushing for a powerful central government while the Muslims stood
for a loose federation of completely autonomous provinces. The Muslims demanded
maintenance of weightage and separate electorates, the Hindus their abolition.
The Muslims claimed statutory majority in Punjab and Bengal, while Hindus
resisted their imposition. In Punjab, the situation was complicated by inflated
Sikh claims.
Eight subcommittees were set up to deal with the details. These
committees dealt with the federal structure, provincial constitution,
franchise, Sindh, the North West Frontier Province, defense services and
minorities.
The conference broke up on January 19, 1931, and what emerged
from it was a general agreement to write safeguards for minorities into the
constitution and a vague desire to devise a federal system for the country.
Gandhi-Irwin Pact
After the conclusion of the First Round Table Conference, the
British government realized that the cooperation of the Indian National
Congress was necessary for further advancement in the making of the Indian
constitution. Thus, Lord Irwin, the Viceroy, extended an invitation to Gandhi
for talks. Gandhi agreed to end the Civil Disobedience Movement without laying
down any preconditions.
The agreement between Gandhi and Irwin was signed on March 5,
1931. Following are the salient points of this agreement:
§ The Congress would discontinue the Civil Disobedience
Movement.
§ The Congress would participate in the Round Table
Conference.
§ The Government would withdraw all ordinances issued to
curb the Congress.
§ The Government would withdraw all prosecutions relating to
offenses not involving violence.
§ The Government would release all persons undergoing
sentences of imprisonment for their activities in the civil disobedience
movement.
The pact shows that the British Government was anxious to bring
the Congress to the conference table.
Second Round Table Conference
The second session of the conference opened in London on September
7, 1931. The main task of the conference was done through the two committees on
federal structure and minorities. Gandhi was a member of both but he adopted a
very unreasonable attitude. He claimed that he represented all India and
dismissed all other Indian delegates as non-representative because they did not
belong to the Congress.
The communal problem represented the most difficult issue for
the delegates. Gandhi again tabled the Congress scheme for a settlement, a mere
reproduction of the Nehru Report, but all the minorities rejected it.
As a counter to the Congress scheme, the Muslims, the depressed
classes, the Indian Christians, the Anglo-Indians, and the Europeans presented
a joint statement of claims which they said must stand as an interdependent
whole. As their main demands were not acceptable to Gandhi, the communal issue
was postponed for future discussion.
Three important committees drafted their reports; the Franchise
Committee, the Federal Finance Committee and States Inquiry Committee.
On the concluding day, the British Prime Minister, Ramsay
MacDonald appealed to the Indian leaders to reach a communal settlement.
Failing to do so, he said, would force the British government would take a
unilateral decision.
Quaid-i-Azam did not participate in the session of the Second
Round Table Conference as he had decided to keep himself aloof from the Indian
politics and to practice as a professional lawyer in England.
On his return to India, Gandhi once again started Civil
Disobedience Movement and was duly arrested.
Third Round Table Conference
The third session began on November 17, 1932. It was short and
unimportant. The Congress was once again absent, so was the Labor opposition in
the British Parliament. Reports of the various committees were scrutinized. The
conference ended on December 25, 1932.
The recommendations of the Round Table Conferences were embodied
in a White Paper. It was published in March 1933, and debated in parliament
directly afterwards, analyzed by the Joint Select Committee and after the final
reading and loyal assent, the bill reached the Statute Book on July 24, 1935.
The Government of India Act 1935
The Government
of India Act 1935 was the last
constitution of British India. It
lasted until 1947, when British India was split into Pakistan and India. The Act gave Indian provinces more independence. It
allowed the establishment of an All India Federation.
After the failure of the Third Round Table Conference, the
British government gave the Joint Select Committee the task of formulating the
new Act for India. The Committee comprised of 16 members each from the House of
Commons and House of Lords, 20 representatives from British India and seven
from the princely states. Lord Linlithgow was appointed as the president of the
Committee. After a year and a half of deliberations, the Committee finally came
out with a draft Bill on February 5, 1935. The Bill was discussed in the House
of Commons for 43 days and in the House of Lords for 13 days and finally, after
being signed by the King, was enforced as the Government of India Act, 1935, in
July 1935.
The main features of the Act of 1935 were:
§ A Federation of
India was promised for, comprising both provinces and states. The provisions of
the Act establishing the federal central government were not to go into
operation until a specified number of rulers of states had signed Instruments
of Accession. Since, this did not happen, the central government continued to
function in accordance with the 1919 Act and only the part of the 1935 Act
dealing with the provincial governments went into operation.
§ The Governor
General remained the head of the central administration and enjoyed wide powers
concerning administration, legislation and finance.
§ No finance bill
could be placed in the Central Legislature without the consent of the Governor
General.
§ The Federal
Legislature was to consist of two houses, the Council of State (Upper House)
and the Federal Assembly (Lower House).
§ The Council of
State was to consist of 260 members, out of whom 156 were to be elected from
the British India and 104 to be nominated by the rulers of princely states.
§ The Federal
Assembly was to consist of 375 members; out of which 250 were to be elected by
the Legislative Assemblies of the British Indian provinces while 125 were to be
nominated by the rulers of princely states.
§ The Central
Legislature had the right to pass any bill, but the bill required the approval
of the Governor General before it became Law. On the other hand Governor
General had the power to frame ordinances.
§ The Indian Council
was abolished. In its place, few advisers were nominated to help the Secretary
of State for India.
§ The Secretary of
State was not expected to interfere in matters that the Governor dealt with,
with the help of Indian Ministers.
§ The provinces were
given autonomy with respect to subjects delegated to them.
§ Diarchy, which had
been established in the provinces by the Act of 1919, was to be established at
the Center. However it came to an end in the provinces.
§ Two new provinces
Sindh and Orissa were created.
§ Reforms were
introduced in N. W. F. P. as were in the other provinces.
§ Separate
electorates were continued as before.
§ One-third Muslim
representation in the Central Legislature was guaranteed.
§ Autonomous
provincial governments in 11 provinces, under ministries responsible to
legislatures, would be setup.
§ Burma and Aden were
separated from India.
§ The Federal Court
was established in the Center.
§ The Reserve Bank of
India was established.
Both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League opposed
the Act, but participated in the provincial elections of winter 1936-37,
conducted under stipulations of the Act. At the time of independence, the two
dominions of India and Pakistan accepted the Act of 1935, with few amendments,
as their provisional constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment